Campaigning All Year Round

Pothole Competition Winner Announced!

3.48.00pm GMT Thu 13th Mar 2008

Stephen Robinson with competition winner Heather Searle (photography: Chris Butler)

Chelmsford Liberal Democrats have announced the results of their competition to find the worst pothole in Chelmsford. The number of entries received demonstrated just how bad the problem is across Chelmsford. The winner was Heather Searle from the Kings Road area, where the problem is particularly acute, as can be seen from the photos on: http://chelmsford-libdems.org.uk/pages/Potholes.html

Chelmsford Parliamentary Candidate Stephen Robinson, seen pictured awarding Mrs. Searle with a signed bottle of House of Commons wine, commented 'It is not surprising the public are so fired up over this issue. The state of the roads in and around Chelmsford is simply not good enough, yet the County Council are cutting the budget and insisting on leaving potholes to get larger before they are repaired. The potential hazard to cyclists in particular is very dangerous'.

Thw winning entry from King's Road (photography: Chris Butler)

The Liberal Democrats have called on the County Council to invest more money in Essex's roads and footpaths, but their proposals were voted down by the Conservatives. Chelmsford Liberal Democrats will be continuing to campaign about the state of the roads and pavements would be particularly interested in hearing from anyone in Chelmsford who has been affected by the state of the roads.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Cllr. Nichols highlights the waste of Easter Egg packaging (Mon 10th Mar 2008).
Next news story: Residents' battle to save Courtman House continues (Mon 31st Mar 2008).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Chelmsford Liberal Democrats, Ian Gale, 20 Dane Road, Chelmsford, CM1 2SS.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.