![]() |
![]() |
| Chelmsford Liberal Democrats | 8th October 2008 | <info@chelmsford-libdems.org.uk> |
Stephen Robinson urges close monitoring of postal votes2.29.48pm BST (GMT +0100) Fri 15th Apr 2005
West Chelmsford Lib Dem Parliamentary Candidate Stephen Robinson says that a dramatic rise in the number of applications for postal votes has raised concerns about electoral fraud. He said, "A survey conducted by the Times found applications had increased by as much as five times in some marginal seats, compared with the 2001 election. Applications overall had almost trebled since 2001." Stephen commented, "There must be close monitoring of how postal votes are handled in the General Election to deter and detect fraud. Changes to electoral law are urgently needed to restore confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and to ensure that people can vote in proper conditions of secrecy." "Our policy in West Chelmsford is to follow scrupulously, the Electoral Commission's guidelines on dealing with postal votes This demands that party activists should not normally handle postal ballot papers or help voters to fill in their forms. However the guidance says that the voter can hand completed ballot papers to candidates or party workers, provided they are sealed. In this case the ballot paper should be posted to returning officers or taken to them as soon as possible (and definitely within two days)."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Fri 25th Jul 2008: Chelmsford Residents hit hard by rising prices - Stephen Robinson. Wed 4th May 2005: A personal thank you from Stephen Robinson. Mon 25th Apr 2005: "Iraq War - Never Again!". Says Stephen Robinson. Fri 18th Mar 2005: Stephen Robinson challenges our MP over Phone mast controls. Mon 10th Jan 2005: 2,500 more Post Offices could close under Labour - Robinson. Mon 1st Nov 2004: Stephen Robinson says, "Climate of Fear is Undermining Civil Liberties". Tue 20th Apr 2004: Published and promoted by Chelmsford Liberal Democrats, Ian Gale, 20 Dane Road, Chelmsford, CM1 2SS. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |